Book Review: Our End of the Lake

Our End of the Lake, by Ron Foster, is about a man named Dave who finds himself in Atlanta, about 180 miles from home when a solar storm causes an apparently world-wide EMP event. He’s also cut off from the bug out bag in the back of his car, on the far side of the city in the wrong direction.

Dave is former Army, a moderately advanced prepper, probably in his 50s, and had just been hired on with FEMA the morning of the EMP event. So like many of the main characters in survival fiction, Dave is leaps and bounds ahead of the general public.

Unlike some depictions of FEMA employees as spineless, remora-like commies, Dave’s new boss, Jack, “was a grizzled old First Sergeant from the Vietnam era that had retired from the Army.” The boss, a few other employees and Dave were in a bar celebrating his new job – fairly carefree drinking is a theme throughout the book.

The power goes out and the FEMA guys quickly figure out what happened. As FEMA has no real plan to deal with such an event, Dave sets off for home on foot with a younger co-worker who needs to travel most of the same route.

Feeling naked without a pack and preparing for a long hike on foot, one of the first things Dave does is steal a drop cloth and some rope from an unattended painters van to make a horseshoe pack (complete with illustration). This is the first of a good bit of looting framed as scavenging that takes place throughout the story, enough to render Rawles catatonic.

This is a good place to note that the author picks out tips and little tricks that might be useful and turns them into a teaching moment with instructions. Some of these are useful, a few are strange, such as very detailed instructions later in the book for starting a vintage tractor that was unaffected by the EMP.

Since this is in the first few days of the event, things aren’t as dangerous as they will become, and they take the highway towards their destination. The do a good job of looting vehicles along the way, end up meeting some really nice people and getting slightly liquored up.

When they make it to the rural destination of the younger co-worker, again everyone is nice, everyone is pitching in to prepare, there is a fantastic BBQ, Dave make a deal to use an antique tractor to drive the rest of the way to his home, and there is a good bit of drinking.

Dave makes it home to his mother and makes contact with his ex-girlfriend, also a prepper. They pull in a few close friends and work on stockpiling as much food and supplies as they can, and they do pretty well. Although it’s now been many days since the EMP, they run into no real security issues, and there is some drinking going on.

They soon decide to leave their city before things fall apart and get dangerous. Using the tractor to pull a trailer with their supplies, they make their way to a secluded lake where they have a friend.

Once at the lake, they find most cabins deserted and commence systematic looting. They talk about security and firearms, meet some really nice people, had a feast of sorts, do some drinking, etc.

I don’t harp too much on the grammatical and spelling errors (glass houses and all) found in most recent self-published survival fiction, but the Kindle version had some annoying formatting issues that need to be dealt with.

And if you can’t tell, I fault the author with making the apocalypse sound sort of like a good time where you’ll meet a lot of nice folks and get comfortably numbed with booze, sounds like a party. Aside from sounding like a feel-good party, in a real situation like this if you start looting like Dave and crew were, you’d probably get shot fairly quickly.

Also, this book is sold as, “the complete Prepper Trilogy Containing Books 1-3,” which may be used to justify the $7.25 price tag, but seemed about as long as an average book.

Overall this is a fair read, but I’d borrow if from the library rather than buy.

Advertisement

7 Responses to “Book Review: Our End of the Lake”


  1. 1 russell1200 13 December 2011 at 6:25 am

    If you go to the One Second After website, the author posts a study that shows the effects of EMP.

    They don’t match what is in his book! LOL

    http://empcommission.org/

    I think what happened is that One Second After cribbed the EMP effects from the online version of Lights Out.

    http://reflexionesfinales.blogspot.com/2011/02/lights-out-review.html

    Some, but not all vehicles, turn themselves off when hit by simulated EMP conditions. And guess what! Most of them will restart! This of course makes a huge difference in the way that the scenarios play out, and also questions the permanant disability of all electronics.

    I don’t think the report was out when Crawford wrote Lights Out, but I am not sure what everyone elses excuse is.

    Solar activity was supposed to have increased in the coming years with the regular solar activity cycle: it has actually decreased. This actually brings up some uncomfortable issues of global cooling.

  2. 2 3rdMan 13 December 2011 at 8:02 pm

    The vehicles are not the problem, it will be the power grid. No power no Gas! The government study also indicates this fact and also projects a death rate in the area of 90% for the U.S in the first year if we lost the power grid. So do not get to excited about your car being able to restart.

  3. 3 Michael 16 December 2011 at 3:19 pm

    I read one of Foster’s books that took place a little later on while they were living on the lake and the main character got to run around showing everyone how smart he was and being the boss man of the place. I wasn’t real impressed.

    I recently finished reading Break Down by Katherine Hanna which was fantastically well written. It’s more of an alternative history, where we look at society 5 or 6 years after collapse (in this case Y2K really did mess stuff up and a pandemic flu hit at the same time) than a prepper thing and it’s mostly set in England, but well worth checking out.

  4. 4 Suburban Survivalist 16 December 2011 at 8:50 pm

    I think I was a bit harsh; the book is an overall good read with many good points for survivalists, but you do have to be careful about some of the advice that might get you killed.

    Russell,
    I’ve read parts of the study and noticed that with guarded optimism, since I’m also skeptical since they have relatively little real-world data study when it comes to modern electronics.

    3rdMan,
    I’d take a bunch of cars starting over none after an EMP anyday; from my present location I need to bug out ~1,300 miles (DC area to Nebraska). Also, a few working vehicles, especially diesel, would help whoever survives in the short-to-medium term.

    Michael,
    Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll check out Katherine Hanna’s book, sound good.

  5. 5 3rdMan 17 December 2011 at 5:44 pm

    My comment was directed towards Russell1200 post, but yes better to have the vehicle running in the short term after the event if possible

  6. 6 Ron Foster (@SolarPrepper) 23 December 2011 at 3:26 pm

    I really appreciate you taking the time to do a review of this book and I enjoyed your comments. Procuring,scavenging,commandeering as the establishment calls it when the do it,appropriating etc. is a legitmate means of survival as well as a skill if life threatening events require it. I would not call my characters looting however, I would call them surviving by the only means they had at hand from abandoned resources. I think this is a good topic that all Preppers should be talking about now and each can use their own moral compass to project how they would act in a similar situation. I think that the Prepper Fiction genre and other disaster books allow us to analyze a situation as a “what if” or what did the author or character do wrong in a situation that we all can learn from and critic. Often there are no right or wrong answers and responder and critic opinions can also be evaluated further to form common core or group decided best acceptable knowledge. Miram Webster defines looting as

    1
    a : to plunder or sack in war b : to rob especially on a large scale and usually by violence or corruption
    2
    : to seize and carry away by force especially in war
    intransitive verb
    : to engage in robbing or plundering especially in war

    I don’t think anyone could say that the characters engaged in taking things that did not belong to them in my books under that definition. I want to commend you for writing such a articulate and fair review. The characters do drink entirely too much and its a story theme, its also what happens regularly in real world disaster scenarios amongst many people. Hurricane party anyone? Its great that forums such as yours can discuss all aspects of how peoples physical and mental personifications as they relate to specific disasters or circumstances can be examined for substance. Thank you again.
    Ron Foster

  7. 7 Suburban Survivalist 28 December 2011 at 11:23 pm

    Ron,

    I agree that scavenging is/will be a completely legitimate activity. There are many instances of the main characters taking things not theirs that are not that. Let’s try the legal definition of loot;

    http://research.lawyers.com/glossary/loot.html

    Loot
    Definition – Transitive Verb
    1 : to rob esp. during or following a catastrophe (as war, riot, or natural disaster)

    2 : to rob esp. on a large scale and usu. by violence or corruption
    : to engage in robbing esp. after a catastrophe

    Various states will have their own code. After a TEOTWAWKI event, no one is going to consult that code or Webster’s dictionary, they’re just going to string up the thieves.

    The first instance in the book after leavening the bar fits the legal definition (painters van). So do many others. I guess you can just assume it’s been discarded and is therefore actually scavenging vs. looting, but that’s sort of making it up as you go. There is a difference between those two activities and the definitions aren’t a “moral compass” issue. There would be a lot of gray areas (is something abandoned or not?), but it’s still a good way to get shot.

    If the main character knows it’s an EMP event (long term, TEOTWAWKI), then bringing up a hurricane party (hours to days in most cases) is apples/oranges. Also not too smart considering security. Of course it would happen in such a situation, but if one knows it’s an EMP, it would be stupid to do.

    I’m not trying to sound all high and mighty. In such a case I could be reduced to looting if lost my supplies, was unable to make it to my family home, etc. I have worked hard to try to prevent that, and if I was ever in that situation I’d of course try not to get myself killed, but it would already be life or death at that point. I’d know it was in fact looting and be prepared for the consequences.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Join 135 other followers




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 135 other followers